JUDGING CRITERIA
Core Evaluation Criteria
Conceptual Framework
Underlying principles, values, core ideas, and philosophy of the project
Public and Cultural Benefits
The amenity of the project and its conceptual contribution to the public domain
Relationship of Built Form to Context
Concepts engaged with new and pre-existing conditions
Program Resolution
Functional performance assessed against the brief
Integration of allied Disciplines
Contribution of others, including engineers, landscape architects, artists and other specialists to the outcome
Cost/Value Outcome
The effectiveness of decisions related to financial issues
Sustainability
The benefit to the environment through design
Response to Client and User Needs
Additional benefits interpreted from the brief, serving the client or users and the community
All entries which have any Heritage components must comply with an include the required accompanying four (4) entry documents in part 5 of the Policy whether it is entered in the Heritage Category, or in another award Category, and adhere with the eight Core Evaluation Criteria above.