Menu
We met on the first day of university back in 2004, the journey to running our own practice has been a slow one. After graduation I joined Tara at Clare Cousins Architect (CCA) where she had started as a student. Tara continued on at CCA eventually becoming a Senior Associate and running some of the practice’s most complex projects including Nightingale Evergreen. After two years with CCA I left Melbourne and spent four years working in Boston where I gained experience in completely different types of work including a large-scale urban regeneration project in Detroit and enormous tech-company office fit outs. On my return from the US I spent around 12 months working alone and decided that sole practice was definitely not for me. While the idea of our own business had been floated over beers many times, we didn’t start a serious discussion until I was back home. Eventually in 2020, we both started working full-time in the business. Tara and I had worked together in so many different capacities over the years and we knew that we would be a good fit.
The project started while I was still overseas when one of my oldest friends asked if I would help her renovate an incredible apartment she had recently purchased in the city. While this was a side-hustle for me, I asked Tara to occasionally jump in and help when distance and time zones made things impossible. Not long afterwards, Tara began working on the Thornbury Townhouses for her brother and his wife’s family. We were incredibly lucky to have each other for support and a second opinion while undertaking our first individual projects. It also meant that when we launched the business, we collectively had a portfolio of built work which is invaluable for securing the next job.
We’re very committed to creating strong spaces and environmentally responsive designs regardless of budget. Often this is a challenge, but we enjoy the process of stripping things back and focusing our energy where simple moves will be the most transformative. We’re particularly satisfied when we can get a project’s heavy lifting done through volume, outlook and access to light. We’re very keen to contribute to responsibly increased density in Melbourne’s suburbs and love working on multi-residential projects that offer a different product and don’t overwhelm their neighbourhoods.
We are both very pragmatic designers and our starting point is always exploring the constraints of a project. We design very collaboratively, and our process starts with a real outpouring of ideas from the whole team. Sometimes a strong concept presents itself and just fits, but more often than not the end product is a union of several ideas and is stronger for it. As the project develops, one of us generally takes the reins with the help of our team.
We’re not precious designers and are happy to let ideas grow from a project – it’s context, it’s the clients, it’s constraints. So, from that perspective we’re rarely aiming to explore a particular concept from the outset. Our work reflects the negotiation that happens between Tara and I in the design process. I’m a bit more bold in my aesthetic choices and love colour. Tara, on the other hand is drawn to a more neutral and textured palette, and unlike me, she always knows where to draw the line! We’re both becoming more comfortable pushing this dynamic and forcing ourselves out of our comfort zones because our work is definitely more exciting when both of our points of view are visible in the final product.
We’re firm believers that good architecture should be accessible, and I think our social media presence reflects this. Although it’s not highly curated, we’re aware of how important our social media is. We’re both consumers of other people’s content and it’s lovely to feel connected to work being produced by the broader architecture community so easily. Humour and humbleness also come easily to us because like any new business owner it’s easy to be racked with self-doubt You need to laugh about it and just keep pushing forward.
From a business perspective, both of us have spent the majority of our careers working for women-run businesses both in Melbourne and overseas. I’m sure this has given us the confidence to go out on our own. Additionally, working overseas in an environment where people are unabashedly self-promoting was a surprisingly refreshing experience. The Australian self-deprecating manner makes us great employees, but I think it means we often question our ability. While my overseas experience provided an invaluable perspective, it also made us aware of the opportunities that exist back home – engaging with a client base who are interested and informed about design, and being part of a local design community who are always producing interesting and inspiring work.
I don’t think we’ll ever feel like we’ve nailed architecture. That would mean it’s time to retire! So much of our profession is problem solving, from the initial stages of design through to working with builders on site. It’s pretty easy to find projects where challenges have been ignored. For instance, I’m sure the design and delivery of volume-built homes is pretty stress free, but the outcome then reflects that. I think as architects we’re essentially seeking out the challenges of any project. Sometimes you can address them in design, sometimes you jump on them during construction and sometimes you miss them, but you always learn from them and take that with you into the next project.
Elizabeth Campbell is a project architect at Kennedy Nolan with broad experience across single and multi-residential, cultural and commercial projects. She is a researcher, writer and contributing editor of Architect Victoria.
Published online:
31 May 2021
Source:
Architect Victoria
Lost for Words
May / Jun
2021
Joshua Darvill, coordination, engagement and participation manager at Ozanam House provides a snapshot of the services provided, long-term sustainable outcomes and reassessing the needs of the community.
A photo essay of architectural photography. Daniel Moore asked established architectural photographers about their first memorable project, finding their way into the profession and/or working with early career architects.
Recently, we have seen many news stories pointing to the bounce back and now surge in house prices in our capital cities. With this, a host of public servants, politicians, residential property investors, and homeowners sit back content, another KPI met, clearly all is well in the garden. The low interest rates, the decades-long incentives rewarding this investment are working. But are they? Are we getting the housing infrastructure we need, in the locations and in the form and tenure required to build the Australia we need economically and socially?
We fell into our practice with little planning, much optimism and a dose of imposter syndrome. Our first project was to blame; a friend was starting a cafe and bar in a beautiful art-deco building on Carlisle Street and we were doing the fit-out. With the promise of a prominent built project on the horizon, we felt sure that we were on our way (spoiler: we were pretty wrong).
Director Alex Lake shares how Therefore has spring boarded into residential architecture from a prior base of commercial work – “an atypical direction given most small practices begin with residential work”.
For the National Gallery of Victoria’s 2020 Triennial outdoor program, BoardGrove Architects designed a collection of transient pavilions situated in the gallery’s Grollo Equiset Garden. Drawing on their diverse experience, BoardGrove designed a novel response that skillfully responded to the project brief’s size and budget.
With more funding available than we’ve seen in a generation, there is the will to reimagine social housing sites. Architects, urban designers and public servants have duly taken up the subject. But how to frame the problem?
In the rapid exchange of information that is now a daily reality of contemporary practice there seems to be little time for wisdom. Speed rules. Communication is dynamic. Considered correspondence remains an obligation of our profession yet the hourly deluge of emails that we all deal with in practice is anathema to this fundamentally important component of our practising modality.
Brunswick Lean-to is a discrete addition to a heritage-listed weatherboard cottage. The project draws upon the ubiquitous lean-to it replaced; a colloquial structure often overlooked or demolished in the event of an extension. Blair Smith Architecture demonstrates sensitivity and depth of thought, addressing opportunities and constraints through site-responsive spatial planning and the packaging of multifunctional elements in a robust, utilitarian structure.
Breathe’s project for Aboriginal Housing Victoria has been approached with rigour to deliver a high-quality project embedded with sustainable design principles and cultural engagement.
This is not my Country, and because it’s not my Country, I cannot speak on its behalf. This statement is true for me, and almost every built environment professional in Australia, so how can we work on and with the Countries that we are responsible for fundamentally modifying?
A visual essay of contemporary social housing projects in Melbourne and regional Victoria from some of the architects and providers working in this important space.
Interview with Nick Harding, Principal of Ha Architecture.
Jeremy McLeod and Madeline Sewall of Breathe Architecture on sustainability, right-sized housing and building more with less.
Can we improve the responsiveness of our architecture through our own experience?
Learning from the existing architecture, Cera Stribley developed a framework for making subtle alterations synonymous with the original house.
How we understand architecture, how we share its values and how architecture is situated within our changing world, is literally unthinkable without the written word.
Architectural journals are powerful agents in the story of architecture.
Sharp wit and a touch of well-timed sarcasm can be the first door for a populist audience to walk through in contemplating what is right and what is fundamentally wrong with our modern built environment.
