Ozanam House: MGS Architects

Ozanam House | MGS Architects | Photographer: Trevor Mein

Joshua Darvill, coordination, engagement and participation manager at Ozanam House provides a snapshot of the services provided, long-term sustainable outcomes and reassessing the needs of the community.

Q: Tell us briefly how Ozanam House works. How does the provision of services interact with the provision of housing? Or is housing a separate issue managed independently?

They say the cure to homelessness is affordable housing, and this is particularly true in metropolitan Melbourne where the demand for housing far, far outstrips the supply. Ozanam House exists to support people who are at a crisis point in their lives because they have been economically disadvantaged from the provision of housing and have exhausted all their social and community connections. Hence Ozanam House is here to provide the interim support to address the issues and barriers that have prevented them from obtaining sustainable long-term accommodation. To catch people when they are at that real crisis point in their lives and give them safe and secure accommodation. By giving them support from the moment people arrive our primary goal is to help people leave and never come back because those issues no longer affect them.

Q: Are there statistics which you can point us to that give us the typical duration of that pointy end you’ve mentioned?

The average resident stays at Ozanam House for 103 days. However, the question about duration is difficult to answer because the clients are so diverse. We support people who are entrenched in homelessness or come from an experience of longterm rough sleeping and marginal housing, and others who are first time homeless (through COVID, family violence, mental health or other factors) and have never had these experiences before. It is a very broad population which is becoming broader. For example, older females are an emerging cohort – many typically have not been the breadwinners for their families and are finding themselves homeless towards the latter part of their lives. We have had to adapt our practice and response accordingly.

Q: How does the walk-in service work in reality? How does it work practically?

There are several ways in which people enter the system. The practical pathways into accommodation support are generally through the Homelessness and Housing Access Points which are funded by the Victorian Government and run by not-for-profit agencies like VincentCare. Access points service local government areas, and we have an intake worker who collaborates with them to identify people in need, so that as soon as there is a vacancy we can prioritise depending on individual need and vulnerability. Typically, someone will go to an access point and undertake an assessment, however, Ozanam House also has a big intake directly from mental health in-patients units, police, hospital emergency departments and others in the community whom we come across that are not readily able to engage with homelessness services.

Ozanam House | MGS Architects | Photographer: Trevor Mein
Ozanam House | MGS Architects | Photographer: Trevor Mein
Ozanam House | MGS Architects | Photographer: Trevor Mein
Q: Can you give us a snapshot of a day in the life of Ozanam House. What happens during the day or night?

We had to modify our services a lot during COVID. Pre-COVID, the Homelessness Resource Centre (HRC) was an open-access service where we opened our doors at 7.30am and offered our clients coffee, meals, social and recreational activities, health and treatment services and other supports. Through the pandemic, we have had to adjust to operate a more restricted, COVID-safe service – we offer meals and referral services through a window (the cafe/social enterprise courtyard on Flemington Road). There will be a point in the next couple of months when we are planning to reopen the HRC – as soon as we can safely do so.

Ozanam House is staffed 24/7; however, the majority arrive at about 7.30am. Staff do a handover, and the intake workers will then look at the vacancies for the day. We offer three meals to all our residents: breakfast, lunch and dinner. We have a commercial kitchen, staffed by a catering manager and cooks. We have two broad cohorts of staff on site: engagement workers, who manage the operational side of things, such as making sure people pay their service fees, managing critical incidents and running planned activities. We also have the support workers who manage the one-on-one case management with our residents – collaborating on case plans and working to identify the support our residents need to exit into longer-term sustainable outcomes.

Q: So, what is critical? If other housing providers want to adopt your model but are unable to provide the range of services available, what are the essentials/ fundamentals that are needed?

Fundamentally, we are a crisis accommodation service; however, the support component comes first. We are a program that offers support with accommodation attached. In other words, any viable model of crisis accommodation, which is geared towards achieving long-term sustainable outcomes, puts support front and centre and uses that as the foundation for the accommodation. We have been purposeful in ensuring the support component drives the physical environment as well as the broader components of residential accommodation.

Q: So, for those whose issue is mainly affordable housing how much support is still required?

In the absence of affordable housing for people on lower incomes, which is really the status quo in Victoria, the support we provide is about maximising people’s earning capacity. For that cohort, the issue is strictly that they cannot afford housing, so we will help them find something through the homelessness service system that is affordable such as social or community housing, or support them to increase their income so they can afford housing in the private rental market.

Q: What lessons and potential positives have come out of periods of lockdown?

That’s a very good question! At the end of last year, we commented a lot on strength when we were reflecting on 2020. We highlighted the resilience of the clients we work with and the staff. If anything, COVID demonstrated that as a service and as a facility we are very capable at working reactively when the context changes.

The other big lesson for us in 2020 was the importance of making sure that in addition to support and accommodation, that we also offer people meaningful social and community programs that they actually want to participate in. Client-led ways for our residents to use their time. Part of our model revolves around participation. This is just as much about clients giving back as us offering activities and meaningful social and community programs that are driven by the client.

Therefore, 2020 was often about speaking with our residents and saying that we’ve all got a curfew, we only have four reasons to leave our homes, and there’s not a lot to do. So how can we make this time together worthwhile for you?

Q: So, was the lesson then about stepping back and reassessing what was essential?

Yes, that is a good summary. What are the real fundamentals and needs? How can we make Ozanam House more than the place that people come to when they have no other option, where typically, we are catching someone at their worst, most chaotic, anxiety-inducing or turbulent period of their life How do we make it a space that is also conducive to growth, betterment, and how do we make our service as positive an experience as we can?

Q: Have you received feedback from that time, or is this still to come?

We have actually done some work on that and periodically receive feedback. Recently we have had some really positive feedback, with 70% of residents agreeing or very strongly agreeing that they were very well looked after throughout the pandemic, that their experience was of a high standard, and the service delivery outstanding. So, the majority were very satisfied.

Q: Did they talk specifically about the sorts of activities that they found more helpful?

The information we have is quite general but what they found was that they were able to maintain a general semblance of structure and normality through the lockdown period.

Q: Can you please go through the recovery model which is at the essence of the services you provide? The notion that housing and recovery are strongly linked.

VincentCare’s overriding practice framework is called the Homelessness Recovery Model, which speaks to the fact that people typically come to Ozanam House in a state of crisis. During that pre-recovery period, we spoke with our residents regularly about their goals. Through our involvement and engagement with the person, we seek to assist their recovery by surrounding them with the support they identify as needing. It is a very client-led process.

Through this period, we make sure that people are aware of what they are entitled to, and advocate for them when they are not getting it. Through a recovery-based intervention, we seek to lead people into a period of growth where they are sustained with housing and their crisis is stabilised so that when our support is finished they are then able to lead an autonomous, independent life in their community of choice.

Q: There was a lot of discussion about the provision of meals during the briefing stage of the project. Are meals also distributed to the wider community experiencing homelessness?

Currently the kitchen is used for cooking meals for Ozanam House residents and Homelessness Resource Centre clients. However, we definitely recognise the huge potential in this space.

Q: More specifically about the building now, can you tell us what works well and what doesn’t work? How could the design be improved?

In terms of things that work well, it’s the vast majority of things. The standard of amenity is exceptional – not just for crisis accommodation, but in general. It’s a well thought out building. Fixtures and finish are well above the standard. Aesthetically it is above and beyond any others of its kind, I think, what really impresses people from the start, the combination and the fact that Ozanam House is so far removed from people’s expectation of what crisis accommodation is.

It’s a very dynamic space as well so it’s constructed in a way that allows us to change the activity in the space. For example, one space is used as a meal service space and then last week, we converted the same area into a marketplace. Similarly, the space can be used for presentations, or you know I think it’s got the latitude to be what it needs to be to deliver the services that we provide. The other thing is that the staff areas are well thought out and I imagine that I will never work in a space as good as this!

It is difficult to say what doesn’t work but it is in the type of work we do that we are presented with challenges, so no space is going to work 100% of the time for 100% of the people. There are little things that we say like: “we might want a CCTV camera here or there” but nothing major. We have never said “I wish this was different”.

Eli Giannini LFRAIA, principal MGS Architects, is the ‘G’ in MGS Architects. Over the last 30 years Eli has been responsible for the design direction of the practice and also winning numerous industry awards. Eli has promoted architectural design, theory and research through her practice, teaching, writing, exhibitions, and conference presentations and as eminent architect on various competition jury panels.

Published online:
20 Jan 2022

Source:
Architect Victoria
Edition 1
2022

More from Architect Victoria

Balfe Park Lane: Kerstin Thompson Architects

Considered across the scales of the neighbourhood, building and apartment, Kerstin Thompson Architects’ recently completed Balfe Park Lane is a demonstration of medium-density housing that is contextual, amenable and lasting. The project lies on a rapidly densifying section of Nicholson Street, where the facades of new developments jostle for attention above nondescript ground floors.

Read more

Re-valuing

Through process and approaches that engage with multiple notions of heritage including problematic ones of environmental and cultural destruction, architecture can participate in the widening of a heritage discourse.

Read more

Maggie Edmond: Edmond & Corrigan

Edmond & Corrigan has employed an incomparable number of young architects who have gone on to have prolific careers with their own practices or as sole practitioners. Daniel Moore asked practice director Maggie Edmond some questions.

Read more

A crucible for new housing typologies

Faded photos of public housing projects from the early 1980s line the corridor walls of the Department of Families, Fairness and Housing, marking the time since the medium density infill housing program, led by John Devenish at the Ministry of Housing. The program became a crucible for new housing typologies as it pursued a policy of diversification through infill, opening up the opportunity to commission emerging practices.

Read more

Napier Street for Milieu: Freadman White

Freadman White’s simultaneous development of Napier Street and Whitlam Place harnessed unique efficiencies and resulted in a highly efficient model for project delivery.

Read more

Amelia Borg, Kushagra Jhurani and Peter Elliott: How to get a job

Early career professionals are often guided by a practice’s development guidelines. Many help by pairing graduates with an experienced graduate, registered architect, or even an architect who has achieved the highest levels of success in our industry. It becomes apparent that the practice of architecture is very different to studying architecture.

Read more

Lovell Burton: Springhill House and Barwon Heads House

Lovell Burton grew organically from a conversation over many years. We share a common endeavour to shape the built environment with a social, environmental and fiscal approach.

Read more

Emerging Architect Prize: Alexander & Sheridan Architecture

In 2021, Jacqui Alexander and Ben Sheridan were the Victorian recipients of the Emerging Architect Prize. With a diverse CV of research, publications, exhibitions, and built work, Daniel Moore spoke with Jacqui about her achievements in the time that she has been emerging in the architecture profession.

Read more

Calk House: Mani Architecture

Putting strong relationships with their clients at the forefront, and remaining bonded with their projects after completion, the Mani Architecture team are “reminded on how we have changed our clients’ lives for the best”.

Read more

Architectural photography

A photo essay of architectural photography. Daniel Moore asked established architectural photographers about their first memorable project, finding their way into the profession and/or working with early career architects.

Read more

Investment in affordable housing quality: Why the industry should support it

Recently, we have seen many news stories pointing to the bounce back and now surge in house prices in our capital cities. With this, a host of public servants, politicians, residential property investors, and homeowners sit back content, another KPI met, clearly all is well in the garden. The low interest rates, the decades-long incentives rewarding this investment are working. But are they? Are we getting the housing infrastructure we need, in the locations and in the form and tenure required to build the Australia we need economically and socially?

Read more

Building a folio

We fell into our practice with little planning, much optimism and a dose of imposter syndrome. Our first project was to blame; a friend was starting a cafe and bar in a beautiful art-deco building on Carlisle Street and we were doing the fit-out. With the promise of a prominent built project on the horizon, we felt sure that we were on our way (spoiler: we were pretty wrong).

Read more

Homelessness and social housing

Arron Wood, former Deputy Lord Mayor of the City of Melbourne, on how architecture and good urban design can have a positive impact on the supply of social and affordable housing.

Read more

Richmond House: Therefore

Director Alex Lake shares how Therefore has spring boarded into residential architecture from a prior base of commercial work – “an atypical direction given most small practices begin with residential work”. 

Read more

NGV Triennial Outdoor Pavilions: BoardGrove Architects

For the National Gallery of Victoria’s 2020 Triennial outdoor program, BoardGrove Architects designed a collection of transient pavilions situated in the gallery’s Grollo Equiset Garden. Drawing on their diverse experience, BoardGrove designed a novel response that skillfully responded to the project brief’s size and budget.

Read more

Revisited: Some aspects of housing overseas

With more funding available than we’ve seen in a generation, there is the will to reimagine social housing sites. Architects, urban designers and public servants have duly taken up the subject. But how to frame the problem?

Read more

Generation Exchange

In the rapid exchange of information that is now a daily reality of contemporary practice there seems to be little time for wisdom. Speed rules. Communication is dynamic. Considered correspondence remains an obligation of our profession yet the hourly deluge of emails that we all deal with in practice is anathema to this fundamentally important component of our practising modality.

Read more

Brunswick Lean-to: Blair Smith Architecture

Brunswick Lean-to is a discrete addition to a heritage-listed weatherboard cottage. The project draws upon the ubiquitous lean-to it replaced; a colloquial structure often overlooked or demolished in the event of an extension. Blair Smith Architecture demonstrates sensitivity and depth of thought, addressing opportunities and constraints through site-responsive spatial planning and the packaging of multifunctional elements in a robust, utilitarian structure.

Read more

Process over product

Breathe’s project for Aboriginal Housing Victoria has been approached with rigour to deliver a high-quality project embedded with sustainable design principles and cultural engagement.

Read more

This is not my Country

This is not my Country, and because it’s not my Country, I cannot speak on its behalf. This statement is true for me, and almost every built environment professional in Australia, so how can we work on and with the Countries that we are responsible for fundamentally modifying?

Read more